While I think that the idea of selling off government-owned foreclosure properties is a good one, the idea of the government requiring the new owner to rent out the property is a bad one... and it goes beyond the government telling a private citizen what he/she can/can't do with privately owned property. Let's say that I am an investor. And let's say that I buy 100 houses in a development that is owned by the government. I want to raise the houses and put in condos, apartments, or turn it back into a forest. Whatever. With this program, I can't do that. Not only can't I do that but I also (and here is what is really bugging me about this) have to go through a number of federal, state, and local hoops to ensure that the houses comply with all of the regulations required to rent a house - ADA being one of the most costly, in many cases. Also, if I'm an investor who does rent those houses out, am I required to rent a certain portion out as Section 8 or can I rent to whomever can pay me fair market value?
There are too many unknown variables in this scenario. Once again, the good idea fairy strikes without thinking the whole thing through.