I don't see how she did anything wrong. Appearing in porn is not illegal, and her students are too young to be watching it in the first place. I certainly don't see how it's grounds from firing from a public school. If it was a private school with "moral" clauses (similar to the unwed mother thread we had) then it would be different, she would have violated a contract (although the article makes it hazy if she was "moonlighting" as a porn actress or doing it prior to her position at the school, so even then it may not be applicable). But in this instance? It's none of their darn business. She did nothing wrong legally, and as far as I knew having sex doesn't render you intellectually incapacitated so it doesn't affect her ability to teach. As long as she's not making porn with one of her students I don't understand the witch hunt.
Edited by Karen1985 - 4/23/12 at 3:48am